Döbler MK, Drasch K (2026)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2026
Book Volume: 20
Journal Issue: 1
URI: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/8500
DOI: /10.18148/srm/2026.v20i1.8500
Open Access Link: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/8500
This paper addresses two methodological debates: first, it examines the
consistency of responses in mixed-method designs; second, it does so
with a particular focus on older people, both with and without cognitive
impairments, living in care institutions. The empirical basis consists
of 135 semi-structured interviews with individuals aged 50 to 92,
conducted in residential homes for the elderly. We compare responses to
open, narrative questions with those to closed questions on three
topics: quality of life, decision to move, and cognitive decline. We
conclude that responses on the same topic are generally consistent,
although declining cognitive ability reduces this consistency. With this
article we contribute to the discussion on the feasibility of surveying
older (institutionalised) people with and without cognitive impairment,
as well as the potential and benefits of combining qualitative and
quantitative data.
APA:
Döbler, M.-K., & Drasch, K. (2026). Addressing Answer Consistency of Residents in Residential Homes: Experiences From a Mixed Methods Study. Survey Research Methods, 20(1). https://doi.org//10.18148/srm/2026.v20i1.8500
MLA:
Döbler, Marie-Kristin, and Katrin Drasch. "Addressing Answer Consistency of Residents in Residential Homes: Experiences From a Mixed Methods Study." Survey Research Methods 20.1 (2026).
BibTeX: Download