Phantom-based training of ultrasound-guided breast biopsy in medical education: a randomized controlled trial comparing handheld and high-end ultrasound
Greiner B, Akers M, Zeman F, Goetz A, Brandenstein M, Stroszczynski C, Jung EM, Hammer S (2025)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2025
Journal
Book Volume: 25
Article Number: 551
Journal Issue: 1
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-07163-1
Abstract
Background: Modern handheld ultrasound devices (HUDs) are attractive for teaching programs in undergraduate medical education due to their miniaturization and portability along at relatively low cost. They offer high-resolution imaging and are easy to use, opening up new possibilities for training of novices in ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous procedures. The objective of this study was to investigate if guidance by HUD is on par with a cart-based high-end ultrasound scanner (HEUS) regarding performance times and success rates in video- and phantom-based training of novices in US-guided freehand breast biopsy. Methods: 32 medical students without any experience in performing US-guided percutaneous biopsies, who had previously completed a standardized diagnostic US training program, were randomized into either a HUD-group (n = 16) or a HEUS-group (n = 16). After a video training lecture participants performed US-guided biopsies of hypoechogenic and hyperechogenic target-lesions in a breast phantom using either a HUD or a HEUS. Performance times and success rates were primary outcomes. Participants were asked to complete a post-study questionnaire (Likert Scale and Raw NASA Workload Task Load Index) for subjective assessment of the operability and individually perceived workload of both US imaging tools and guidance-techniques as secondary outcomes. Results: Biopsy success rates were slightly higher using the HUD (79.7%) in comparison to the HEUS (68.8%, p = 0.045). Median performance times were similar for the HUD (0.63 min, interquartile range IQR = 0.37–1.08 min) compared to the HEUS (0.60 min, IQR = 0.30–2.09 min, p = 0.751). Operability and the individually perceived workload were rated equal. Conclusions: Percutaneous biopsy performed by novices using HUDs is feasible, performance times, success rates, operability and the individually perceived workload were on par with HEUS-guidance. HUDs can be used as cost-effective tools for percutaneous biopsy training purposes in medical education.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
Germany (DE)How to cite
APA:
Greiner, B., Akers, M., Zeman, F., Goetz, A., Brandenstein, M., Stroszczynski, C.,... Hammer, S. (2025). Phantom-based training of ultrasound-guided breast biopsy in medical education: a randomized controlled trial comparing handheld and high-end ultrasound. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07163-1
MLA:
Greiner, Barbara, et al. "Phantom-based training of ultrasound-guided breast biopsy in medical education: a randomized controlled trial comparing handheld and high-end ultrasound." BMC Medical Education 25.1 (2025).
BibTeX: Download