Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a delphi process

Bennett C, Vakil N, Bergman J, Harrison R, Odze R, Vieth M, Sanders S, Gay L, Pech O, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Romero Y, Inadomi J, Tack J, Corley DA, Manner H, Green S, Al Dulaimi D, Ali H, Allum B, Anderson M, Curtis H, Falk G, Fennerty MB, Fullarton G, Krishnadath K, Meltzer SJ, Armstrong D, Ganz R, Cengia G, Going JJ, Goldblum J, Gordon C, Grabsch H, Haigh C, Hongo M, Johnston D, Forbes-Young R, Kay E, Kaye P, Lerut T, Lovat LB, Lundell L, Mairs P, Shimoda T, Spechler S, Sontag S, Malfertheiner P, Murray I, Nanji M, Poller D, Ragunath K, Regula J, Cestari R, Shepherd N, Singh R, Stein HJ, Talley NJ, Galmiche JP, Tham TC, Watson P, Yerian L, Rugge M, Rice TW, Hart J, Gittens S, Hewin D, Hochberger J, Kahrilas P, Preston S, Sampliner R, Sharma P, Stuart R, Wang K, Waxman I, Abley C, Loft D, Penman I, Shaheen NJ, Chak A, Davies G, Dunn L, Falck-Ytter Y, Decaestecker J, Bhandari P, Ell C, Griffin SM, Attwood S, Barr H, Allen J, Ferguson MK, Moayyedi P, Jankowski JA (2012)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2012

Journal

Book Volume: 143

Pages Range: 336-346

Journal Issue: 2

DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.032

Abstract

Background & Aims: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA. Methods: We performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. Results: Eighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated. Conclusions: We developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies. © 2012 AGA Institute.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

Queen Alexandra Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust (MTW) GB United Kingdom (GB) Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Amsterdam UMC) / Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra NL Netherlands (NL) McMaster University CA Canada (CA) Università degli Studi di Brescia IT Italy (IT) Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI) GB United Kingdom (GB) Tohoku University Hospital JP Japan (JP) Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh NHS Trust GB United Kingdom (GB) University of Washington US United States (USA) (US) Trinity College Dublin IE Ireland (IE) University of Dallas US United States (USA) (US) Royal Marsden Hospital / The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust GB United Kingdom (GB) University of Newcastle (UoN) AU Australia (AU) University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) US United States (USA) (US) Queen's University GB United Kingdom (GB) Oregon Health and Science University (OSHU) US United States (USA) (US) Mayo Clinic US United States (USA) (US) Durham University GB United Kingdom (GB) University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire GB United Kingdom (GB) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill US United States (USA) (US) Case Western Reserve University US United States (USA) (US) Harrogate District Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) Royal Victoria Infirmary GB United Kingdom (GB) Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center US United States (USA) (US) Klinikum Bayreuth DE Germany (DE) Kaiser Permanente US United States (USA) (US) Cleveland Clinic US United States (USA) (US) University of Padua / Universita degli Studi di Padova IT Italy (IT) University of Minnesota (UMN) US United States (USA) (US) Royal Bournemouth Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) Northumbria Healthcare (NHS Foundation Trust) GB United Kingdom (GB) Nottingham University Hospitals GB United Kingdom (GB) Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL) / Catholic University of Leuven BE Belgium (BE) University College London (UCL) GB United Kingdom (GB) National Cancer Center Hospital JP Japan (JP) University of Chicago US United States (USA) (US) Oesophageal Cancer Fund IE Ireland (IE) University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust GB United Kingdom (GB) Gloucestershire Hospitals GB United Kingdom (GB) Queen Mary University of London GB United Kingdom (GB) University of Adelaide AU Australia (AU) University of Wisconsin - Madison US United States (USA) (US) Warwick Medical School GB United Kingdom (GB) Nantes University Hospital / Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU) FR France (FR) University of Ulster GB United Kingdom (GB) St. Bernward Krankenhaus DE Germany (DE) Northwestern University US United States (USA) (US) Barts Health NHS Trust GB United Kingdom (GB) Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital US United States (USA) (US) Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg DE Germany (DE) Royal Cornwall Hospital / Treliske Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) University of Arizona US United States (USA) (US) University of Kansas (KU) US United States (USA) (US) Johns Hopkins University (JHU) US United States (USA) (US) University of Leeds GB United Kingdom (GB) Scottish Huntington's Association GB United Kingdom (GB) Karolinska Institute SE Sweden (SE) Darent Valley Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB) Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology / Centrum Onkologii–Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie w Warszawie PL Poland (PL) Städtisches Klinikum München DE Germany (DE) Harvard University US United States (USA) (US) City Hospital GB United Kingdom (GB)

How to cite

APA:

Bennett, C., Vakil, N., Bergman, J., Harrison, R., Odze, R., Vieth, M.,... Jankowski, J.A. (2012). Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a delphi process. Gastroenterology, 143(2), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.032

MLA:

Bennett, Cathy, et al. "Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a delphi process." Gastroenterology 143.2 (2012): 336-346.

BibTeX: Download