Undisruptable or stable concepts: can we design concepts that can avoid conceptual disruption, normative critique, and counterexamples?

Lundgren B (2024)

Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2024

Journal

Ethics and Information Technology Kluwer Academic Publishers

Book Volume: 26

Article Number: 33

Journal Issue: 2

DOI: 10.1007/s10676-024-09767-5

Abstract

It has been argued that our concepts can be disrupted or challenged by technology or normative concerns, which raises the question of whether we can create, design, engineer, or define more robust concepts that avoid counterexamples and conceptual challenges that can lead to conceptual disruption. In this paper, it is argued that we can. This argument is presented through a case study of a definition in the technological domain.

Authors with CRIS profile

Björn Lundgren Lehrstuhl für Theory and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (Alexander von Humboldt-Professur)

How to cite

APA:

Lundgren, B. (2024). Undisruptable or stable concepts: can we design concepts that can avoid conceptual disruption, normative critique, and counterexamples? Ethics and Information Technology, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09767-5

MLA:

Lundgren, Björn. "Undisruptable or stable concepts: can we design concepts that can avoid conceptual disruption, normative critique, and counterexamples?" Ethics and Information Technology 26.2 (2024).

BibTeX: Download