Bhattacharjee N, Sapozhnik AA, Bodnar SY, Grigorev VY, Agustsson SY, Cao J, Dominko D, Obergfell M, Gomonay O, Sinova J, Kläui M, Elmers HJ, Jourdan M, Demsar J (2020)
Publication Type: Journal article, Erratum
Publication year: 2020
Book Volume: 124
Article Number: 039901
Journal Issue: 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.039901
In our recently published Letter we reported the observation of a pronounced resonance mode centered at 1.1 THz in a metallic collinear antiferromagnet Mn 2 Au . Based on the temperature dependence of the mode frequency, the large oscillator strength, and its temperature dependence, we attributed the mode to the in-plane antiferromagnetic resonance (AFMR) driven by the Neel spin-orbit torque (NSOT) [1]. After publication, complementary room temperature measurements were performed at the FZU Prague, failing to reproduce the result. We realized that the observation was due to an experimental error, caused by the mislabeled thickness of the electro-optical crystal (EOC) used in the original measurement. In particular, the multiple reflections of the THz pulse at the substrate-air and film-substrate interfaces result in a series of weak THz pulses trailing the main transmitted THz pulse, separated in time by twice the optical path through the substrate. Similarly, reflections from the EOC-air surfaces of the near-infrared (NIR) sampling pulse result in a series of (weak) NIR pulses propagating through the EOC, separated in time by twice the optical path of the NIR pulse through the EOC. The two optical paths are normally different (by choosing the thickness of the EOC or substrate), and the weak ghost signals are well-separated in time from the main sampled electric-field transient. In our case, due to mislabeling, the optical paths of the THz and NIR pulses were accidentally perfectly matched, resulting in a weak ghost reflection exactly at the center of the sampling window. As the intensity of the ghost pulse was much stronger when THz pulse was reflected from film-substrate interface (sample) than from the substrate-air interface (reference substrate), this ghost reflection gave rise to the seeming resonance. The temperature dependence of the modes parameters can be linked to the T dependence of the substrates refractive index and the conductivity of Mn 2 Au . By exchanging the EOC crystal this artifact at 1 THz disappeared. A similar, yet weaker spectral feature around 1.3 THz remained. Since the weaker mode at 1.3 THz could indeed be the sought-after AFMR, possible additional artifacts (caused by the birefringence of the substrate or by the buffer layer) had to be excluded first. We made a series of additional measurements on samples grown under different conditions. The final measurements performed on Mn 2 Au films grown without the buffer layer and being Neel vector oriented in high magnetic fields [2] for increased contrast show no clear evidence of an AFMR mode in THz absorption. We conclude that the NSOT-driven AFMR absorption is weaker than our experimental uncertainty. While we cannot exclude that with increased sensitivity such a mode can be observed in a THz transmission experiment, we wish to retract our original Letter.
APA:
Bhattacharjee, N., Sapozhnik, A.A., Bodnar, S.Y., Grigorev, V.Y., Agustsson, S.Y., Cao, J.,... Demsar, J. (2020). Retraction: Néel Spin-Orbit Torque Driven Antiferromagnetic Resonance in Mn2Au Probed by Time-Domain THz Spectroscopy (Physical Review Letters (2018) 120 (237201) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.237201). Physical Review Letters, 124(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.039901
MLA:
Bhattacharjee, N., et al. "Retraction: Néel Spin-Orbit Torque Driven Antiferromagnetic Resonance in Mn2Au Probed by Time-Domain THz Spectroscopy (Physical Review Letters (2018) 120 (237201) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.237201)." Physical Review Letters 124.3 (2020).
BibTeX: Download