China, the Rule of Law, and the Question of Obedience: a Comment on Professor Peerenboom’s Analysis of the CCP 4th Plenary Decision on Law Reform. Reply to Professor Peerenboom’s Reply

Pils E (2015)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2015

Journal

Book Volume: 7

Pages Range: 97-98

Journal Issue: 1

DOI: 10.1007/s40803-015-0007-5

How to cite

APA:

Pils, E. (2015). China, the Rule of Law, and the Question of Obedience: a Comment on Professor Peerenboom’s Analysis of the CCP 4th Plenary Decision on Law Reform. Reply to Professor Peerenboom’s Reply. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 7(1), 97-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-015-0007-5

MLA:

Pils, Eva. "China, the Rule of Law, and the Question of Obedience: a Comment on Professor Peerenboom’s Analysis of the CCP 4th Plenary Decision on Law Reform. Reply to Professor Peerenboom’s Reply." Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 7.1 (2015): 97-98.

BibTeX: Download