Xu Z, Lee CP, Heinrich MP, Modat M, Rueckert D, Ourselin S, Abramson RG, Landman BA (2016)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2016
Book Volume: 63
Pages Range: 1563-1572
Article Number: 7482649
Journal Issue: 8
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2574816
Objective: This work evaluates current 3-D image registration tools on clinically acquired abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Thirteen abdominal organs were manually labeled on a set of 100 CT images, and the 100 labeled images (i.e., atlases) were pairwise registered based on intensity information with six registration tools (FSL, ANTS-CC, ANTS-QUICK-MI, IRTK, NIFTYREG, and DEEDS). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance, and Hausdorff distance were calculated on the registered organs individually. Permutation tests and indifference-zone ranking were performed to examine the statistical and practical significance, respectively. Results: The results suggest that DEEDS yielded the best registration performance. However, due to the overall low DSC values, and substantial portion of low-performing outliers, great care must be taken when image registration is used for local interpretation of abdominal CT. Conclusion: There is substantial room for improvement in image registration for abdominal CT. Significance: All data and source code are available so that innovations in registration can be directly compared with the current generation of tools without excessive duplication of effort.
APA:
Xu, Z., Lee, C.P., Heinrich, M.P., Modat, M., Rueckert, D., Ourselin, S.,... Landman, B.A. (2016). Evaluation of six registration methods for the human abdomen on clinically acquired CT. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(8), 1563-1572. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2016.2574816
MLA:
Xu, Zhoubing, et al. "Evaluation of six registration methods for the human abdomen on clinically acquired CT." IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 63.8 (2016): 1563-1572.
BibTeX: Download