Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps

Tretter M (2022)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2022

Journal

Original Authors: Max Tretter

Book Volume: 2

Pages Range: 1–28

Issue: 1

Journal Issue: 2

DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2

Open Access Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2

Abstract

Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereignty in the digital can be understood. In order to contribute to a better understanding of this concept, I illustrate its complex structure using contact tracing apps as a paradigmatic example. I conduct a narrative review to show what sovereignty looks like in the context of these apps. In the context of digital contact tracing apps, sovereignty is best understood as a complex network of three actors—nations, (big tech) companies, and individuals—that exercise various forms of power against or on behalf of each other to claim sovereignty for themselves and to either weaken or strengthen the sovereignty claims of other actors. Since large parts of the results can be generalized from the particular context of contact tracing apps, they contribute to a better overall understanding of the concept of sovereignty in digital. This might, in turn, be helpful for discussions about this technology as well as about the regulation and governance of the digital in general.

Authors with CRIS profile

Additional Organisation(s)

Related research project(s)

How to cite

APA:

Tretter, M. (2022). Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps. Digital Society, 2(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2

MLA:

Tretter, Max. "Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps." Digital Society 2.2 (2022): 1–28.

BibTeX: Download