Legal vs. ethical obligations–a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics
Müller VC (2017)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2017
Journal
Book Volume: 29
Pages Range: 137-141
Journal Issue: 2
DOI: 10.1080/09540091.2016.1276516
Abstract
While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of five rules of what “should” be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
United Kingdom (GB)How to cite
APA:
Müller, V.C. (2017). Legal vs. ethical obligations–a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics. Connection Science, 29(2), 137-141. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1276516
MLA:
Müller, Vincent C.. "Legal vs. ethical obligations–a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics." Connection Science 29.2 (2017): 137-141.
BibTeX: Download