Systematic evaluation of different types of graphene oxide in respect to variations in their in-plane modulus

Feicht P, Siegel R, Thurn H, Neubauer JW, Seuss M, Szabo T, Talyzin AV, Halbig CE, Eigler S, Kunz DA, Fery A, Papastavrou G, Senker J, Breu J (2017)


Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2017

Journal

Book Volume: 114

Pages Range: 700-705

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.065

Abstract

Graphene oxide samples prepared in various laboratories following a diversity of synthesis protocols based on Brodie's (BGO) and Hummers/Offeman's (HGO) methods were compared in respect of their in-plane moduli. A simple wrinkling method allowed for a spatial resolution <1.5 μm by converting the wrinkling frequency. Quite surprisingly, a drastic variation of the in-plane moduli was found spanning the range from 600 GPa for the best BGO types, which is in the region of chemically derived graphene, all the way down to less than 200 GPa for HGO types. This would suggest that there are no two equal GO samples and GO should not be regarded a compound but rather a class of materials with very variable physical properties. While large differences between Brodie's and Hummers/Offeman's types might have been expected, even within the group of Hummers/Offeman's types pronounced differences are observed that, based on 13C solid-state NMR, were related to over-functionalization versus over-oxidation.

Authors with CRIS profile

Involved external institutions

How to cite

APA:

Feicht, P., Siegel, R., Thurn, H., Neubauer, J.W., Seuss, M., Szabo, T.,... Breu, J. (2017). Systematic evaluation of different types of graphene oxide in respect to variations in their in-plane modulus. Carbon, 114, 700-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.065

MLA:

Feicht, Patrick, et al. "Systematic evaluation of different types of graphene oxide in respect to variations in their in-plane modulus." Carbon 114 (2017): 700-705.

BibTeX: Download