Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations

Schmucker M, Lösel F (2008)


Publication Language: English

Publication Type: Journal article

Publication year: 2008

Journal

Publisher: Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias

Book Volume: 20

Pages Range: 10-19

Volume: 20

Issue: 10-19

Abstract

The article reports a systematic review of controlled outcome evaluations of psychosocial and organic sexual offender treatment. A comprehensive search of the literature in five languages revealed 80 independent comparisons between treated and untreated groups of sexual offenders ( N = 22,181). The majority of studies confirmed a positive treatment effect. Overall, 11.1% of treated offenders and 17.5% of controls showed sexual recidivism (37% difference). Findings for violent and general recidivism were similar. Studies on surgical castration showed the strongest effect; however, this was confounded with methodological and offender characteristics. Hormonal medication, cognitive-behavioural, and behavioural approaches also revealed a positive effect. Non-behavioural treatments did not show a significant impact. Other moderators such as small sample size, authors' affiliation with the program, program completion versus dropout, or type of outcome measure had a significant impact. Methodological study characteristics explained the largest proportion of effect size variance. Overall, findings are promising but more differentiated evaluations of high quality are needed.

Authors with CRIS profile

How to cite

APA:

Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2008). Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations. Psicothema, 20, 10-19.

MLA:

Schmucker, Martin, and Friedrich Lösel. "Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations." Psicothema 20 (2008): 10-19.

BibTeX: Download